Indeed. It did work.
Thank you very much!
Search found 110 matches
- 2017-03-10T12:48:45-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Can't convert PDF to JPG: Image width exceeds user limit in IHDR
- Replies: 7
- Views: 21600
- 2017-03-10T11:46:35-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Can't convert PDF to JPG: Image width exceeds user limit in IHDR
- Replies: 7
- Views: 21600
Re: Can't convert PDF to JPG: Image width exceeds user limit in IHDR
I can use 20GB of RAM for this. I guess this should fit both compressed and uncompressed image?
Is there another way to convert it, please?
Is there another way to convert it, please?
- 2017-03-10T11:13:07-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Can't convert PDF to JPG: Image width exceeds user limit in IHDR
- Replies: 7
- Views: 21600
Can't convert PDF to JPG: Image width exceeds user limit in IHDR
While trying to convert this PDF file into a JPG image I am seeing a Image width exceeds user limit in IHDR error: $ convert -density 600 mapa_araraquara_atualizado_logradouros.pdf output.jpg convert-im6.q16: Image width exceeds user limit in IHDR `/tmp/magick-15788p2oGUMyrtVs31' @ warning/png.c ...
- 2010-11-10T18:41:37-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: 2-colors only JPEG
- Replies: 6
- Views: 20491
Re: 2-colors only JPEG
Understood. Thank you!
- 2010-11-10T18:25:54-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: 2-colors only JPEG
- Replies: 6
- Views: 20491
Re: 2-colors only JPEG
The following gives me 4 colors 0,1,254,255 convert Munch_The_Scream_lithography.png +dither -colors 2 -quality 100 -type bilevel Munch_The_Scream_lithography1.jpg So it's not possible to get 2 colors? But why not just use gif, it gets smaller filesize Actually it's a bug report (http://bugs.debian ...
- 2010-11-10T17:27:15-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: 2-colors only JPEG
- Replies: 6
- Views: 20491
2-colors only JPEG
It seems that it's not possible to generate a JPEG file with exactly two colors only (with RGB #000000 and RGB #FFFFFF only) in all cases, due to limitations in JPEG itself (since it's a lossy format). For example, it's possible to convert this PNG file into a exactly 2-colors only JPEG file ...
- 2010-06-10T06:19:02-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: "unknown field with tag 37724 (0x935c) encountered"
- Replies: 4
- Views: 24530
"unknown field with tag 37724 (0x935c) encountered"
Hi! We have received a bug report (http://bugs.debian.org/585414) about a conversion from TIFF to XPM. Testing with the latest beta version (6.6.2-5) it's still possible to see this: $ convert BatMon_icon.tif -resize 32x32 batmon.xpm convert: BatMon_icon.tif: unknown field with tag 37724 (0x935c ...
- 2010-03-17T09:26:29-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: "montage: unable to read font (null)"
- Replies: 18
- Views: 57363
Re: "montage: unable to read font (null)"
And testing with 6.6.0-6 with type-ghostscript.xml reference removed from type.xml, I still see the same message: $ convert -size 320x85 xc:transparent -font Bookman-DemiItalic -pointsize 72 -draw "text 25,60 Magick'" -channel RGBA -blur 0x6 -fill darkred -stroke magenta -draw "text 20,55 'Magick ...
- 2010-03-17T08:36:24-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: "montage: unable to read font (null)"
- Replies: 18
- Views: 57363
Re: "montage: unable to read font (null)"
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/i ... fonts1.txt is the output of "identify -list font".
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/i ... fonts2.txt is the result without including type-ghostscript.xml in type.xml
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/i ... fonts2.txt is the result without including type-ghostscript.xml in type.xml
- 2010-03-17T07:49:20-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: "montage: unable to read font (null)"
- Replies: 18
- Views: 57363
Re: "montage: unable to read font (null)"
Hi! With the patch applied the problem is still present: I've just built and installed a set of local imagemagick packages with the suggested patch from upstream (adding "Utopia" as an alternative font family) and I'm afraid I have to report that I still get the same problem: $ montage IMG_3058.jpg ...
- 2010-03-15T16:38:10-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: "montage: unable to read font (null)"
- Replies: 18
- Views: 57363
Re: "montage: unable to read font (null)"
Hi! There was no <typemap> </typemap> in type.xml. But even after including these two lines: $ convert -size 320x85 xc:transparent -font Bookman-DemiItalic -pointsize 72 -draw "text 25,60 'Magick'" -channel RGBA -blur 0x6 -fill darkred -stroke magenta -draw "text 20,55 'Magick'" output.png convert ...
- 2010-03-15T13:43:34-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: "montage: unable to read font (null)"
- Replies: 18
- Views: 57363
"montage: unable to read font (null)"
Hi! We are having some issues related with fonts in ImageMagick (version 6.0.0-4) on Debian (see http://bugs.debian.org/573983) where an user is having this problem (that I cannot reproduce): $ montage test.jpg test1.jpg montage: unable to read font `(null)' @ error/annotate.c/RenderFreetype/1044 ...
- 2010-01-15T12:48:49-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: "make install" is broken
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5663
"make install" is broken
Hi!
It seems that there is something broken on ImageMagick 6.5.9-0
Doing a simple "./configure; make; make install", on a clean chroot, we have empty dirs at /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.5.9/modules-Q16/coders and /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.5.9/modules-Q16/filters
Thank you!
It seems that there is something broken on ImageMagick 6.5.9-0
Doing a simple "./configure; make; make install", on a clean chroot, we have empty dirs at /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.5.9/modules-Q16/coders and /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.5.9/modules-Q16/filters
Thank you!
- 2010-01-15T04:35:16-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: fontconfig and config/type.xml
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8242
fontconfig and config/type.xml
Hi! If ImageMagick is compiled with fontconfig support, is it necessary to have config/type.xml installed? Or at least, can this part be removed from it? <typemap> <include file="type-ghostscript.xml" /> </typemap> The doubt is if ImageMagick will find the system fonts if using fontconfig (and thus ...
- 2010-01-12T03:53:45-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Missing symbols between ImageMagick releases
- Replies: 19
- Views: 44560
Re: Missing symbols between ImageMagick releases
Well... actually I am not a new user of Debianbroucaries wrote:Any news of this effort ?
A new user of debian encounter a problem with symbols see viewtopic.php?f=2&t=15311