I have just learned that it is possible to put a statement in the file indicating what rendering (dot, neato, twopi, etc.) to use. I will send you the details later on. If a users has specified it, then you can use it to determine how to render it, or I think dot will call the proper rendering even ...
Thanks for the options to try out. See below the result. $ dpkg -l |grep -i imagema ii imagemagick 7:6.5.1.0-1.1ubuntu3 image manipulation programs ii imagemagick-doc 7:6.5.1.0-1.1ubuntu3 document files of ImageMagick ii libmagick++2 7:6.5.1.0-1.1ubuntu3 object-oriented C++ interface to ImageMagick ...
Here is an example, a typical gv file for twopi rendered properly with twopi: http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/3744/screenshot1ob.png and rendered incorrectly with dot: http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/3541/screenshot2lg.png Of course you decide what ImageMagick should do with these files, but I ...
I have asked around on the Graphviz development mailing list and there I found out that the way ImageMagick is rendering DOT or GV files is far from trivial. DOT or GV files can be processed by the executables dot, neato, fdp, sfdp, twopi, circo and more. See the images on the right hand side under ...
I'm referring to distribution (Ubuntu) package level. But in order to decide what to choose, can anyone tell me for what functionality this dependency is for?
Hi all, I use both Graphviz and ImageMagick but what puzzles me is the dependency that ImageMargick had on libgraphviz. Why is that there? What functionality does ImageMagick use from Graphviz? Since, I'm using development version of Graphviz, my package manager keeps complaining that libimagemagick ...