Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

Thanks, we'll get the patch into the next point release of ImageMagick, 6.6.4-5. Hello, There's still one line #define _AFX_NO_TRACKER_RESOURCES in the IMDIsplay.rc file, which is why the bug is in the static portable version 6.6.4-6 of IMDisplay.exe . That line has to be removed too. Tilman ...

No I took it from http://www.imagemagick.org/download/binaries/ImageMagick-6.6.4-Q16-windows.zip . That's usually the same file. You just have to re-download. It's now the correct version, but the IMDisplay bug is still in the static portable. (mouse cursor vanishes within selection window, see ...

You mean this distribution, right? ftp://ftp.imagemagick.org/pub/ImageMagick/binaries/ImageMagick-6.6.4-Q16-windows.zip Did you really re-download it? What you write was true for the.. 'first edition' of the 6.6.4-5 portable files. But the latest (third?) edition reports "6.6.4-6" as version number ...

I think there's still some trouble:
The current distribution is labelled as 6-6-4-5 on the web page, the static portable one is labelled as 6.6.4, but it is 6-6-4-4. Thats what convert and IMDisplay tell me.

Tilman Hausherr

The static version of IMDisplay.exe has a bug that the mouse cursor becomes invisble when hovering within the selected rectangle. The cause is explained in Q208856 : _AFX_NO_TRACKER_RESOURCES must not be defined in the .rc file. Here's a revised .rc file http://pastebin.com/XgKV31Sx alternatively ...

Good stuff. Can you post a URL to your modified Resource.h, IMDisplay.rc, and IMDisplay.cpp so we can download it and test your changes. If they work as expected, we'll get the patches into the main ImageMagick distribution. There it is: http://pastebin.com/reZce6Bs http://pastebin.com/EaX0SNmn ...

Good stuff. Can you post a URL to your modified Resource.h, IMDisplay.rc, and IMDisplay.cpp so we can download it and test your changes. If they work as expected, we'll get the patches into the main ImageMagick distribution. There it is: http://pastebin.com/reZce6Bs http://pastebin.com/EaX0SNmn ...

Hello, The file open dialogbox is unpractical because it doesn't show all image types immediately. I suggest an improvement, so that people get shown all common images: In the rc file, add this below IDR_IMGIFTYPE: IDR_IMIMAGETYPE "\nImage\n\nCommon image files\n.jpg;.png;.tif;.tiff;.bmp;.wmf;.mif ...

Hello, I suggest the following change, which would have the version string displayed in the about box. in the rc file, in IDD_ABOUTBOX add the line with IDC_STATIC_VERSION, and possibly change the numbers from the first line (I can't remember if I had to enlarge the dialogbox) IDD_ABOUTBOX DIALOGEX ...

Seems to have been fixed now. Tilman Hello, I just downloaded these two 6.6.4-3 files from http://imagemagick.com/script/binary-releases.php#windows : http://www.imagemagick.org/download/binaries/ImageMagick-6.6.4-3-Q16-windows-x64-static.exe http://www.imagemagick.org/download/binaries/ImageMagick ...

Hello, I just downloaded these two 6.6.4-3 files from http://imagemagick.com/script/binary-releases.php#windows : http://www.imagemagick.org/download/binaries/ImageMagick-6.6.4-3-Q16-windows-x64-static.exe http://www.imagemagick.org/download/binaries/ImageMagick-6.6.4-Q16-windows.zip However both ...

magick wrote:We fixed the problem you reported in ImageMagick 6.6.4-3 Beta available by sometime tomorrow. We make a different libTIFF call for old-style JPEG images and it handles the exception properly.

Yes, the bug is fixed in the 6.6.4-3 beta version (static build). Thanks!

Bug is fixed in the 6.6.4-3 beta version (static build). Thanks!

I think your file may be corrupted or have some special "feature" as I cannot open it with other tools on my Mac such as Preview. Photoshop opens it. In one tool I get an error message that it cannot handle compression 7. Many tools have trouble displaying JPEG in TIFF .tif files. Some can't handle ...

The exception is thrown by libTIFF, not ImageMagick. We call libTIFF and ask for image pixels and it comes back and say you're not getting any because there is "an Improper call to JPEG library in state 0.". We'll investigate and see if we can get libTIFF to return the pixels even with the ...