Search found 12 matches
- 2011-05-11T23:13:03-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
Re: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
Can you give an example command. I will then put that and your comment in the video formats area. This is what I used that I snipped from some other source online. It probably has extra options I don't need but it makes a nice time-lapse from .jpg files mencoder -nosound mf://*.jpg -mf w=800:h=371 ...
- 2011-05-11T22:25:46-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
Re: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
thanks for everybody's help - I'm going to delete download links to save bandwidth
Whoever is writing the docs for IM should just put under "video", "USE MENCODER"... wow it's like 1000 times faster and actually WORKS.
Whoever is writing the docs for IM should just put under "video", "USE MENCODER"... wow it's like 1000 times faster and actually WORKS.
- 2011-05-11T21:48:53-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
Re: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
I discovered mencoder and it looks like it works amazingly well:
- 2011-05-11T20:00:37-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
Re: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
I can't find any examples of directly calling ffmpeg that work for me. It's installed on the system and apparently used by IM.
- 2011-05-11T19:41:41-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
Re: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
I tried using m2v: as in: convert ar1-*.jpg m2v:out.mpg
It still resulted in a 1.5MB crappy quality file
I'm stuck.
Is there an alternative to IM to use for something like this? I simply want to create a time-lapse video of approximately 400-500 jpgs that is of non-horrendous quality.
It still resulted in a 1.5MB crappy quality file
I'm stuck.
Is there an alternative to IM to use for something like this? I simply want to create a time-lapse video of approximately 400-500 jpgs that is of non-horrendous quality.
- 2011-05-11T18:52:39-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
Re: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
actually, wtf..... the web site says: 'The current release is ImageMagick 6.6.9-8.' why do I have 6.6.6.10?
- 2011-05-11T18:48:05-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
Re: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
I get almost identical results if I use "-quality 100" - it makes no sense and is driving me crazy... HELP!!
- 2011-05-11T18:21:05-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
Re: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
# convert -list configure Path: /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.6.6/config/configure.xml Name Value ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC cc -std=gnu99 -std=gnu99 CFLAGS -I/usr/local/include/lqr-1 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0 ...
- 2011-05-11T18:00:52-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
Re: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
The command is the same for both: convert *.jpg -quality 85 output.mpg There is a file called ffmpeg2pass-0.log being generated that says stuff like: (don't know if it means anything) in:471 out:471 type:2 q:3658 itex:252 ptex:778 mv:303 misc:1998 fcode:1 bcode:1 mc-var:103979 var:98645 icount:1 ...
- 2011-05-11T16:19:08-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
Re: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
I just noticed something when I put new and old mpegs side-by-side. The original images are in 640x480 resolution and the output mpeg is in that resolution, but the new version convert seems to convert the image into a perfect square and that may be responsible for the horrible quality... how do ...
- 2011-05-11T16:07:23-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
Re: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
What would be a high-quality setting? I tried: -sampling-factor 1x1 and it didn't appear to make much of a difference.
- 2011-05-11T14:02:59-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
- Replies: 21
- Views: 55136
significant quality loss moving from 6.2 to 6.6..
I have a script that runs that takes webcam .JPG images and converts it to an MPEG file using this command: nice -n 5 /usr/local/bin/convert $ARCDIR/*.jpg -quality 85 /mpeg-archive/daily_timelapse.mpg I recently moved this system/scripts from a FreeBSD 6.2 server using: ImageMagick 6.2.2 01/02/07 ...