That was it! Once I added the other percentage sign, we got lift-off:
Search found 3 matches
- 2011-05-29T19:52:22-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Issue with fuzz & floodfill
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10015
Re: Issue with fuzz & floodfill
YES!!!
That was it! Once I added the other percentage sign, we got lift-off:
That was it! Once I added the other percentage sign, we got lift-off:
- 2011-05-29T18:09:55-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Issue with fuzz & floodfill
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10015
Re: Issue with fuzz & floodfill
Yeah, I had tried that sequence too, but it didn't change anything.
I had also tried it with a JPG version of the same image, but no difference.
If I fill the area in IrfanView (with a tolerance of just 1%) it fills it just fine (barely touching the pants).
I had also tried it with a JPG version of the same image, but no difference.
If I fill the area in IrfanView (with a tolerance of just 1%) it fills it just fine (barely touching the pants).
- 2011-05-29T16:55:25-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Issue with fuzz & floodfill
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10015
Issue with fuzz & floodfill
I'm running V 6.7.0-0 under Windows, andI cannot get the fuzz argument to do anything. No matter what value I choose, and where in the command line I position it, it seems to not be interpreted at all (and only fill at a tolerance of 0%). The command I use is convert orgman.png -fill red -fuzz 20 ...