Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

I'll play around with that

In any case, thank you for all the great help you've provided!

Excellent, the smaller threshold worked a lot better.

The morphology doesn't seem to work on GoDaddy, maybe a version issue? Is there an alternative for the version GoDaddy is running?

Wow, fmw42, that's quite amazing! I've been working on that one for a week! :) Also thanks @ Anthony for the clarification, I'm definitely going for a normal blur. One final question: is it possible to remove smaller objects in the image? (The noise that the blur and the threshold didn't get out ...

I've PM'ed you some of the image samples

Indeed, looks like that was the problem :) This is my verbose output: Array ( [0] => Image: 3.png [1] => Format: PNG (Portable Network Graphics) [2] => Class: PseudoClass [3] => Geometry: 360x220 [4] => Type: Grayscale [5] => Endianess: Undefined [6] => Colorspace: Gray [7] => Channel depth: [8 ...

It's impossible for me to upgrade this version of ImageMagick, as it's running on a shared hosting account. I could ask GoDaddy support to upgrade their version, but I wouldn't expect too much from that... I probably did take the evaluate multiply 16 out of context, you can just ignore it ...

Hi fmw42, First of, thanks, not just for the code examples, but also for the explanation that went with them. Really helped me understand all this better :) I read that normal blurring has a considerable speed advantage over gaussian blurring - and speed will be important as I plan to process quite ...

Hey guys, I'm looking to have a nip2 routine switched over to another image lib. I'd like to switch over to ImageMagick, since this prog seems easier to implement server-side and somewhat faster as well. With this being my first confrontation with ImageMagick, I'd like to as you guys for some help ...