Search found 23 matches
- 2016-01-11T00:41:59-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Tagging images (metadata)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4479
Tagging images (metadata)
Hello, Recently I started writing keywords to my images using convert -set Keywords "%Keywords%" command. I just noticed that other original metadata properties are lost, is there a way to prevent that? I just want to add keywords/tags to images and keep the rest as original as possible, including ...
- 2015-12-13T19:07:48-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Contact sheet items and labels
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4399
Re: Contact sheet items and labels
Thank you so much
One question though, how do I control the space/margin between the label and the image?
One question though, how do I control the space/margin between the label and the image?
- 2015-12-12T03:38:04-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Contact sheet items and labels
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4399
Contact sheet items and labels
Hello everyone, Is it possible to control items order and their labels when creating a contact sheet? Right now I have the following command: montage.exe -gravity south -tile %tile% -verbose -label "%t" -quality 100 -define jpeg:size=200x200 -geometry 200x200+200+100> -auto-orient "D:\Pictures\CS ...
- 2015-07-17T20:08:27-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Tiles within an image
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3455
Re: Tiles within an image
I posted an edited image, the boxes are not empty, each has an image.
I'm still trying.
I'm still trying.
- 2015-07-17T02:45:38-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Tiles within an image
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3455
Tiles within an image
Hello, sorry, couldn't figure it out myself As you can see in the attachment, I want to crop what is inside the boxes and save to separate images, 6 in this case, I don't want to include the cutting borders. click on the thumbnail to see the full image http://img661.imageshack.us/img661/7322/Uw0AxB ...
- 2015-01-21T19:53:43-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New IM release is 64 only
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8642
Re: New IM release is 64 only
Any idea? I'm talking about the portable 32-bit.
Thanks
Thanks
- 2015-01-20T19:47:13-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New IM release is 64 only
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8642
Re: New IM release is 64 only
Is 32-bit support gone again?
- 2014-09-10T21:54:33-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: icon:auto-resize
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15139
Re: icon:auto-resize
Danke
- 2014-09-10T21:23:35-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: icon:auto-resize
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15139
Problem with 256 size under user defined sizes
There is a problem with size 256 if I define sizes This fails: convert.exe "%input_image%" -define icon:auto-resize=256,128,32,16 "%output_image%" Error: convert.exe: InvalidDimensions `D:\output_image.ico' @ error/icon.c/WriteICONImage/896. anything below 256 will work. While this works fine to ...
- 2014-01-19T09:29:58-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: icon:auto-resize
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15139
Re: icon:auto-resize
That's great,
Did you test it on a gif? As I said earlier, I tested it once and it failed on gif with multiple images.
Also I think you need to update change-log page.
Hopefully you will release a portable 32 version soon and I can test it and use the new features.
Did you test it on a gif? As I said earlier, I tested it once and it failed on gif with multiple images.
Also I think you need to update change-log page.
Hopefully you will release a portable 32 version soon and I can test it and use the new features.
- 2014-01-13T11:11:13-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: icon:auto-resize
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15139
Re: icon:auto-resize
I did a quick test on a virtual machine because the new IM is not portable and I only run portable apps on my computer. Your code worked fine on jpg and png, but the output of gif was an empty ico file. Could be because that gif contained more than one image, needs more testing, so will wait until a ...
- 2014-01-13T09:51:58-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: icon:auto-resize
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15139
Re: icon:auto-resize
Thanks dlemstra.
It contains pretty much all common sizes, but I think it would be much better to have the sizes user-defined.
Also it fails on GIF.
It contains pretty much all common sizes, but I think it would be much better to have the sizes user-defined.
Also it fails on GIF.
- 2014-01-13T06:30:14-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New IM release is 64 only
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8642
Re: New IM release is 64 only
Thanks for the reply magick
Hope you sort this out by the next release.
Hope you sort this out by the next release.
- 2014-01-13T05:56:38-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: icon:auto-resize
- Replies: 11
- Views: 15139
icon:auto-resize
2014-01-09 6.8.8-2 Changelog says: Added option 'icon:auto-resize' to automatically store multiple sizes in an ico image (requires 256x256 input image). I tested it and the output ICO file contains only one 256x256 image. convert.exe "%input_image%" icon:auto-resize "%output_image%" Also where do I ...
- 2014-01-13T05:31:46-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New IM release is 64 only
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8642
Re: New IM release is 64 only
Ok, but I want the portable one.
And why does it say x86 if its not?
And are you going to stop uploading a portable 32 version?
Confusing :/
And why does it say x86 if its not?
And are you going to stop uploading a portable 32 version?
Confusing :/