Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

@magick: yes, i agree that i can get good results with IM if i use other output then PDF.

But the problem is PDF output, becouse profiles striped (or not correct included)

testphoto with included ProPhoto RGB ICC i grabed from here: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=982758 Portraits looks "brown" / "mucky" if you browser has no colormanagement (e.g. Chrom) http://50.30.47.202/test-prophoto.jpg result with Illustrator/Photoshop (simplest PDF setting ...

not a academical question. very practical from my point of view. advantage of PDF is everyboday has acrobat reader installed for print the final images with JPEG or TIF you have a lot of differend tools to open and print , even with standard system. some does not correct use JPEG included sizes ...

try the "sample" operator.

The "-sample" resize operator is the fastest resize operator, especially in large scale image reduction.

http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/resize/#sample

also try "Resize During Image Read" with [2000x2000] direct after the filename

as far as i can see no profile included in your CMYK image. for that your first -profile applies the (wrong!) srgb.icm to the image and then colorspace does some conversation ... with no profile within input image try: convert "cmyk-in.jpg" -profile cmyk.icc -profile srgb.icm "out-rgb.jpg"

if i save a PDF with Illustrator and have include an image with embedded icc profile Photoshop recognized this profile correct!
so it seams to be a IM issue?

good point!
as far as i tested with CS3 and CS5.5 it does NOT work.

so anybody has a "workaround" to put an icc profile to a PDF so Photoshop will use it?

Hi all, i found some posts to this questions but not realy clear with this. If i convert image with embedded icc profiles into PDF and i open this PDF with Photoshop no profile found/used. Is there a way of getting a PDF with icc profile included so Photoshop can read/apply it correct? IM 6.7.6-8 ...

thanks for explain anthony!
i give your c program a try and this runs much faster then the PHP-API so i will go forward with the c implementation.

thanks for your testing antony! in you example you working with a new wand there you past alle parts. in this way i also got it working. i was afraid about memory consuming becouse my application need to handle parallel big images. so you have a copy of the original wand in memory and i hoped to ...

i did a test with Imagick and got the same result. As far as i understand Imagick is a differend wrapper for Imagmagick API so maybe the "error" is not a bug but my wrong thinking of how to use? $resource = new Imagick('test.jpg'); $tmpres1= new Imagick(); $tmpres1 = $resource->clone(); $tmpres1 ...

this sound interesting for my application. if you need beta-tester just give me a beep :) yes, i tryed all combinations (i think) and can not set the original image at the last one if i add a new image :( how can i check the memory consuming of a wand? MagickGetImageSize() returns after ...

i setup a new server for testing and used the latest ImageMagick-6.7.5-6 (i see there is a new ImageMagick-6.7.5-7 out right now) and MagickWandForPHP-1.0.8 i can work around with a new Wand and put the Images with MagickAddImage($resource2,$tmpres1); MagickAddImage($resource2,$resource ...

Hi Anthony, thanks for your investigation. the first MagickSetLastIterator($resource); has no effekt to the result infront of the second MagickAddImage(); it works. i can set the position with MagickSetLastIterator($resource); so i can get only "$resource - $tmpres1 - $tmpres2" or "$resource ...

Hi all, i have a problem with the order of images put together with MagickAppendImages(); $resource = NewMagickWand(); MagickReadImage( $resource, 'test.jpg' ); $tmpres1 = CloneMagickWand($resource); MagickFlopImage($tmpres1); MagickAddImage($resource,$tmpres1); DestroyMagickWand($tmpres1); $tmpres2 ...