Search found 5 matches
- 2012-04-07T19:42:44-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Where's ARCHIVE link listing IM versions' OS COMPATIBILITY?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10333
Re: Where's ARCHIVE link listing IM versions' OS COMPATIBILI
When I searched and found in various messages people using ImageMagick on Windows 2000, I figured that ImageMagick once was compiled by you into Windows-2000-compatible versions, the latest version of which I would download from this site. Certainly, I don't expect OS-peculiar support for ...
- 2012-04-07T19:22:28-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Where's ARCHIVE link listing IM versions' OS COMPATIBILITY?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9232
Re: Where's ARCHIVE link listing IM versions' OS COMPATIBILI
Thanks, fmv42, for your effort and all the links. None hits the mark, unfortunately. Following a link to an archive of older versions leads to a list like this: ARCHIVE The current version of WonderApp is 7.2 (2012-04-01). Specs and more info at the Intro Page . WonderApp 7.1 Released 2012-01-30 ...
- 2012-04-07T17:51:16-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Where's ARCHIVE link listing IM versions' OS COMPATIBILITY?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10333
Where's ARCHIVE link listing IM versions' OS COMPATIBILITY?
(Reposted here from the USERS section, after suggestion by forum member fmw42) 1.) The Advanced Search on this board BITES. This criterion spews out 6 pages of mostly unrelated results to sift through: +"Windows 2000" Is there a better way to phrase the search? 2.) This user had the same question ...
- 2012-04-07T17:45:02-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Where's ARCHIVE link listing IM versions' OS COMPATIBILITY?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9232
Re: Where's ARCHIVE link listing IM versions' OS COMPATIBILI
- 2012-04-07T17:20:44-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Where's ARCHIVE link listing IM versions' OS COMPATIBILITY?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9232
Where's ARCHIVE link listing IM versions' OS COMPATIBILITY?
1.) The Advanced Search on this board BITES. This criterion spews out 6 pages of mostly unrelated results to sift through: +"Windows 2000" Is there a better way to phrase the search? 2.) This user had the same question LAST YEAR. No one bothered to answer him: http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse ...