Code: Select all
<delegate decode="dng:decode" stealth="True" command="dcraw -6 -W -O "%u.ppm" "%i""/>Search found 3 matches
- 2013-09-26T01:38:42-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Why is ufraw-batch used by default on linux?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 18291
Re: Why is ufraw-batch used by default on linux?
This is what I've settled on:
Seems to be working just fine.
- 2013-01-14T10:14:20-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Why is ufraw-batch used by default on linux?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 18291
Re: Why is ufraw-batch used by default on linux?
ufraw-batch is available on some of the newer Linux system, not manual install of dcraw is required. You can of course edit delegates.xml on your system and change it from ufraw-batch to dcraw. That's what I'm currently doing, but it's a bit annoying. At least I know why. Thanks for a prompt reply.
- 2013-01-14T09:58:01-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Why is ufraw-batch used by default on linux?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 18291
Why is ufraw-batch used by default on linux?
From my subjective experience dcraw does a much better job converting CR2 files on linux than ufraw-batch. That is with least manual tweaking.
Why is ufraw-batch used in linux by default even though dcraw is available on all platforms?
Why is ufraw-batch used in linux by default even though dcraw is available on all platforms?