Search found 22 matches
- 2017-11-05T08:57:55-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
That solved the issue, thank you very much indeed! Before posting I searched endlessly for the problem, because I thought build headers and binaries are consistent for sure, because I build it from the git repo. When omitting --disable-hdri headers and binaries to not match, so apparently there is ...
- 2017-11-05T07:24:22-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
Debugging starts Header says we have integer, not HDRI But this we already know. By "make sure" I meant to achieve. Since the make commands I used lead to build result that is inconsistent with the headers, which make switches do I need to get a non-HDRI binary, consistent with the headers?
- 2017-11-05T06:54:14-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
maybe I should add that after the build, I have just the HDRI dylib in the output folder, no alternative: ~/git/ImageMagick/Magick++/lib/.libs> ls -l total 22360 -rw-r--r-- 1 stefan staff 118528 29 Aug 22:44 Magick___lib_libMagick___7_Q16HDRI_la-Blob.o -rw-r--r-- 1 stefan staff 105748 29 Aug 22:44 ...
- 2017-11-05T06:50:43-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
The CMake configuration I use for ImageMagick is: set(IMAGEMAGICK_DIR ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/../../ImageMagick) include_directories(${IMAGEMAGICK_DIR}/Magick++/lib ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/../../ImageMagick) target_link_libraries(StratonImageProcessing ${IMAGEMAGICK_DIR}/Magick++/lib/.libs/libMagick++-7 ...
- 2017-11-05T06:38:19-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
Ah this forum uses pages. Sorry for double posting, I was missing my post but then I realized it is not on the first page
- 2017-11-05T06:33:52-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
Good idea, thanks. I will check that. I am new to Mac/Linux, so maybe I did something wrong when installing ImageMagick. What I need in the end is a multi platform configuration. Background is that I rewrite my App to work with Windows and Mac, using a Qt interface. But image processing and ...
- 2017-11-05T06:32:35-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
Good idea, thanks. I will check that. I am new to Mac/Linux, so maybe I did something wrong when installing ImageMagick. What I need in the end is a multi platform configuration. Background is that I rewrite my App to work with Windows and Mac, using a Qt interface. Image processing and ImageMagick ...
- 2017-11-05T05:50:40-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
If Quantum was different from uint16_t (like with float), the C++ compiler would issue an error. This is the reason that I use uint16_t instead of Quantum. It avoids any problems with configurations my code does not support anyway. So it is impossible that Quantum is float in my configuration. If ...
- 2017-11-05T03:45:13-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
C++ doesn't allow implicit conversion of pointer types. If Quantum wasn't 2-byte, above code wouldn't compile. No warning, just an error. Nevertheless: /opt/bin> ./magick -version Version: ImageMagick 7.0.7-0 Q16 x86_64 2017-08-29 http://www.imagemagick.org Copyright: © 1999-2017 ImageMagick Studio ...
- 2017-11-04T18:12:58-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
My original code includes such checks, including error checking. I cannot do more than say what I know. If you don't believe me, please download the image and check the number of channels.
- 2017-11-04T10:12:17-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
yes? As said, I only need to handle a very restricted subset of image types. All have 1 channel, all have 16 bit depth. I use ImageMagick just because of the image format reading and writing capabilities, for no other reason. 2013 I reported bugs in the FITS format reading and writing, which have ...
- 2017-11-04T09:04:51-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
Re: problems with Magick::Pixels
I am rewriting from scratch. On Mac, there isn‘t even a previous version. Since v7 was normally released, I see no reason not to use it. So I avoid any need to port later to v7. In addition I thought my question was really simple, isn‘t it? All I want to do is read an image file and access the pixel ...
- 2017-11-04T08:37:12-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: problems with Magick::Pixels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 36992
problems with Magick::Pixels
Hi, my last posting was 2013, where I successfully integrated ImageMagick for reading and writing 16-bit gray image files in my C++ software. Now I am working on a completely new version from scratch on. For some reason, I fail doing even the simplest things with ImageMagick and I don't know what ...
- 2013-02-05T16:36:13-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: FITS images become too bright
- Replies: 18
- Views: 22112
Re: FITS images become too bright
Hi,
I wondered why my posting did not appear under the topic, until I found the topic is somehow splitted into two parts? My last reply is not visible under the original topic (until I found a tiny "Next" button).
Kind regards,
Stefan
I wondered why my posting did not appear under the topic, until I found the topic is somehow splitted into two parts? My last reply is not visible under the original topic (until I found a tiny "Next" button).
Kind regards,
Stefan
- 2013-02-05T16:29:53-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: FITS images become too bright
- Replies: 18
- Views: 22112
Re: FITS images become too bright
Hi, thanks for your version 6.8.2-5. The FITS writing problem of 6.8.2.3 is now fixed, but reading FITS images is still not working properly, especially for 16 bit signed integer FITS format: http://87.106.39.128/ImageMagick/ComparisonFits.png You can download all these images under this link ...