Search found 10 matches
- 2013-02-11T16:46:21-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: A More Formal Description of the ImageMagick Machine
- Replies: 12
- Views: 11468
Re: A More Formal Description of the ImageMagick Machine
OK, everyone, I've got that GUI available now as a beta. I call it MagickWrapper. MacOS only. Details at http://basepath.com. Free for anyone who registers during the beta period.
- 2013-02-08T14:57:41-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Error in website example
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4834
Re: Error in website example
Thanks, Fred. But the issue is that someone new would go to the options page to see what "matte" did, and wouldn't find it in the alphabetical listing. (Actually, the REAL issue is that I'm writing a GUI wrapper for IM and I constructed the various lists of settings, commands, and images from the ...
- 2013-02-08T12:20:24-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Error in website example
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4834
Error in website example
At the very top of one of the first pages (http://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php) is this example: $ convert label.gif +matte \ \( +clone -shade 110x90 -normalize -negate +clone -compose Plus -composite \) \ \( -clone 0 -shade 110x50 -normalize -channel BG -fx 0 +channel -matte ...
- 2013-02-07T10:51:00-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: A More Formal Description of the ImageMagick Machine
- Replies: 12
- Views: 11468
Re: A More Formal Description of the ImageMagick Machine
Thanks, Anthony!
- 2013-02-03T16:09:07-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: A More Formal Description of the ImageMagick Machine
- Replies: 12
- Views: 11468
Re: A More Formal Description of the ImageMagick Machine
fmw42 & glennrp:
Thanks for your comments. That settings don't conform to a simple model insofar as whether they are local to what I call the current image sequence is bothersome.
--Marc
Thanks for your comments. That settings don't conform to a simple model insofar as whether they are local to what I call the current image sequence is bothersome.
--Marc
- 2013-02-03T12:51:19-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: A More Formal Description of the ImageMagick Machine
- Replies: 12
- Views: 11468
Re: A More Formal Description of the ImageMagick Machine
Thanks everyone for these very useful replies. fmw42: I did read the basic page, which was helpful, but also confusing, because it added another term, "list", to the terms "sequence" and "stack", which I already thought was one too many. Having reviewed these comments and looked again at my OP, I ...
- 2013-02-02T17:48:11-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: A More Formal Description of the ImageMagick Machine
- Replies: 12
- Views: 11468
A More Formal Description of the ImageMagick Machine
I'm new to ImageMagick, having started using it just a few days ago. In reading the various pages here and some tutorials linked to from here, I was frustrated that I could not find a abstract description of how it works. Only lots of examples. The page "ImageMagick Command-Line Processing" (http ...
- 2013-02-01T17:33:14-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Build IM on OS X Mountain Lion with FreeType and without X11
- Replies: 17
- Views: 22748
Re: Build IM on OS X Mountain Lion with FreeType and without
I understand. But I was building IM from source. So the sequence was: 1. Install FreeType. 2. configure IM 3. make IM 4. install IM However, my problems are in step #2. The output of configure (and the log) shows me that it did not include FreeType. And, making, installing, and running confirms that ...
- 2013-02-01T16:10:45-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Build IM on OS X Mountain Lion with FreeType and without X11
- Replies: 17
- Views: 22748
Re: Build IM on OS X Mountain Lion with FreeType and without
FreeType is definitely NOT on the list of delegates. That's exactly the problem! I'm trying to build IM 6.8.2. I did install FreeType using MacPorts. When that didn't work, I built it from source. Neither approach got IM's configure to think it was there. Maybe there are some additional configure ...
- 2013-02-01T15:19:04-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Build IM on OS X Mountain Lion with FreeType and without X11
- Replies: 17
- Views: 22748
Build IM on OS X Mountain Lion with FreeType and without X11
No combination of options to configure seems to work. I've installed FreeType as a binary, and also built it from source. No matter what I've tried, and I've tried many different combinations of options, configure always reports this: FreeType --with-freetype=yes no Has anyone actually succeeded in ...