Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

Seems it is a bug in the gcc 4.4x compiler series, and 4.5.x corrected it. So, how far along in higher versions of ImageMagick does ImageMagick believe I should be able to successfully compile with gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8)? Andrew Haley wrote:> On 04/17/2013 02:41 AM, Michael Lueck wrote ...

Posted the question, copy of post at the following URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2013-04/msg00106.html

(sigh...) Off to post to Gnu, anticipating being pointed back to ImageMagick, that "they should know much memory it takes to compile / build their own software". I do not like these runaround situations.

ImageMagick used to be able to be compiled on our server. It does not compile any longer. Other things still do compile successfully. Therefore ImageMagick requires more memory to be compiled currently. How much memory should I request the hosting provider raise the limit to in order to be able to ...

How much memory does it take currently to compile ImageMagick? Our server login shows: > free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 12072 10262 1809 0 175 8935 -/+ buffers/cache: 1151 10921 Swap: 258 137 120 The provider had instructions of how to build ImageMagick in the type of hosting ...

Previously I have successfully built ImageMagick version 6.8.4-9 on our shared web server. The server is running Debian 6.0.7 I found the solution to be able to run ImageMagick 6.3.9-2 as the server runs PHP as a CGI, therefor placing a php.ini in the directory, I am able to receive 128M of ...