I assumed though that all that would be required would be to copy the jxrlib code branch into ImageMagick? Maybe you rather not have the bloat for a format in low demand?
In any case, consider me one vote in favour of jpeg xr support
.Search found 2 matches
- 2013-05-06T17:15:43-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: JPEG XR support question
- Replies: 10
- Views: 25222
Re: JPEG XR support question
Fair enough.
I assumed though that all that would be required would be to copy the jxrlib code branch into ImageMagick? Maybe you rather not have the bloat for a format in low demand?
In any case, consider me one vote in favour of jpeg xr support.
I assumed though that all that would be required would be to copy the jxrlib code branch into ImageMagick? Maybe you rather not have the bloat for a format in low demand?
In any case, consider me one vote in favour of jpeg xr support
.- 2013-05-06T11:07:45-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: JPEG XR support question
- Replies: 10
- Views: 25222
JPEG XR support question
I see that JPEG XR support has been added recently. Though it requires the jxrlib to be manually added. Is there a reason for this? jxrlib is licenced under the BSD licence and could be added directly into the project as far as I can tell.
Just wondering what the reasoning behind this was.
Just wondering what the reasoning behind this was.