Search found 3 matches
- 2013-08-04T11:55:41-07:00
- Forum: Fred's Scripts
- Topic: normcrosscorr
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18925
Re: normcrosscorr
Tried on screenshot, it's ok. Is white so hardly abuses normalization of an image? I can handle amount of white and use -subimage-search
- 2013-08-03T12:56:28-07:00
- Forum: Fred's Scripts
- Topic: normcrosscorr
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18925
Re: normcrosscorr
Thx for reply, here is my code. It's not ok even without blur. # convert wizard: wizard.png # convert wizard.png -crop 150x50+130+80 +repage subwizard.png # ./normcrosscorr -s subwizard.png wizard.png corr.png | tail -n 2 Echo: Match Coords: (168,326) And Score In Range 0 to 1: (0.0943717) Position ...
- 2013-08-02T02:53:14-07:00
- Forum: Fred's Scripts
- Topic: normcrosscorr
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18925
normcrosscorr
This issue applies to normcrosscorr script at http://www.fmwconcepts.com/imagemagick/normcrosscorr/ Firstly, there should be std=`convert $tmpS -format "%[standard-deviation]" info:` instead of std=`convert $tmpS -format "%[standard_deviation]" info:` Secondly, i don't understand why if i blur ...