Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

Thanks for the tip! As the author himself cared enough to answer my thread I will give it another go. I must have done something wrong with the ImageMagick bmp to png conversion. This time I will use the best version like this wget http://www.imagemagick.org/download/ImageMagick.tar.gz tar xzf ...

If you want the very smallest png possible, you might use pngcrush after IM: http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush/ Thanks snibgo. After your post I read around that it is very popular and probably the first of its kind. I compiled the source version with "make" without flags, put pngcrush inside ...

This is not my area of expertise so I hope you will excuse my asking the following "stupid" questions: First of all I failed to install ImageMagick-6.8.8-9.x86_64.rpm I did as instructed on imagemagick.org rpm -Uvh http://www.imagemagick.org/download/linux/CentOS/x86_64/ImageMagick-6.8.8-9.x86_64 ...

I'm not seeing the problem with IM-6.8.8-9 Q16 convert sFGCDET.png -transparent '#FC00FC' sfg.png and convert sFGCDET.png -transparent '#FC00FC' png8:sfg8.png both give me a PNG8. The only difference is that the first contains a bKGD chunk while the other does not. Hello Glen, Thanks for your input ...

Hello everyone! I try to explain my problem as best I can. I have many bmp (about a game) such as this one http://imgur.com/sFGCDET As you can see these pictures have the most unlikely possible colour as background colour (#FC00FC) because my objective is to make #FC00FC transparent. My second ...

Does it cause segmentation faults as well?

I believe this is what is happening to me. Need to upgrade...