Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

Oops, I should have provided the links. This is where the 3 ways are shown https://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/morphology/#showkernel and where every example uses -define showkernel=1 like on the convolve page. -define morphology:showkernel=1 -define convolve:showkernel=1 -define showkernel=1

Thanks! I was looking at the IM v6 Examples where there are 3 ways to define this but Command-line Options does consistently have the morphology: prefix.

Thanks for confirming this bug. I installed the legacy convert since that is what I am used to. By path, I meant the ones under environment variables.

In my discussion with snibgo on another forum , his example convert xc: -define showkernel=1 ^ -morphology Convolve:0 Gaussian:0x2 null: 2>&1 | findstr Kernel doesn't output anything; i.e., the part up to null: . If I do convert xc: -define showkernel=1 ^ -morphology Convolve:0 Gaussian:0x2 info ...

Thanks for your insight, everyone . I feel loved - haha. [Comments on "-w" and "-H 0"] I copy-pasted that from your site . I often use "-w -H 2". I don't seem to have documented my white balancing method, which involves finding how far each channel is from clipping, and using factors that don't ...

Thanks for your time, snibgo . I might just be terrible at photography: in taking photos (in manual mode) and post-processing in attempt to salvage the raws. It's all so time-consuming and nerve-racking. (Maybe I'm looking at it all wrong.) Anyway, I usually end up with a multitude of photos I think ...

Hello All, I've been wondering if there's a quick (automated) way to determine if a set of images are over or under exposed, and if so by how much. I am looking to get results like this . I'm thinking that this would probably involve (crudely): dcraw -v -H 0 -6 -w -W -g 1 0 -o 0 -T -O out_raw.tiff ...

To follow up, I found out how to use X in Windows: start X server then do commands in xterm.

fmw42 wrote:But this function is neither scale nor rotationally invariant.

Are your scripts invariant as well? Maybe I'll try something else (and smaller images). Thanks anyway.

Hello All, I used a script to detect and crop a set of objects, but it isn't color managed and resizes the input. I would like to take the output, find their location in the originals and then crop to get a more accurate set. Unsure whether that's the best approach but it's a start. I've tried using ...

Getting coordinate readout ... by clicking on the image after displaying Opening every image and jotting down the coordinates is tedious. Would this be possible (in Unix)? 1) Display image. Ask for user input via mouse. 2) Retrieve coordinates of pixel location/region. 3)Close image display ...

Believe imdisplay.exe is in the Windows binary. Last time I checked, it doesn't have all the features of display . Sorry about that—I'm using IM built using snibgo's instructions (cygwin): Version: ImageMagick 6.9.0-9 Q32 x86_64 2015-03-04 http://www.imagemagick.org Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2 ...

I would like to quickly display the result; however, when I do > display rose: -OR- convert rose: show: -OR- convert rose: win: display: unable to open X server `' @ error/display.c/DisplayImageCommand/426. -OR- > convert rose: x: convert: unable to open X server `' @ error/display.c/DisplayImages ...

These days, my usual syntax is something like: for /F "usebackq" %%L in (`convert ^ .... See examples in my scripts, such as http://im.snibgo.com/eqlimit.htm#eqLimit.bat My impression is that it pipes the output from one command to another; in your examples, it's used to ECHO results or set them to ...

I do try to figure things out but could you elaborate on this?

snibgo wrote:

Code: Select all

for /F "usebackq" %%L in (`convert ^
  infile ^
  {procesing} ^
  outfile`) do {something}