Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

That would be great; let me know if you need any more information.

Thanks.

Is it appropriate to add this as a bug? I have another library that is using the images sourced from ImageMagick, which is unfortunately giving precedence to the Exif Image Height/Width (Pixel[X|Y]Dimension values) instead of the ImageHeight/Width values. That arguably is a bug in the other library ...

I'm sorry, what's consistent? Does your ExifImageHeight value match the ImageHeight value? I get the following using your exiftool parameters: C:\Apps\test>..\exiftool-9.85\exiftool.exe -s -ee -g1 -u -n -D DSC_1082.JPG | fi ndstr Height - ImageHeight : 683 40963 ExifImageHeight : 3072 The problem is ...

I updated to the latest version of ImageMagick (6.9.0-5 Q16 x86 2015-01-31) & Exiftool (9.85). Here's the result of running Exiftool on the image, before I "mogrified" it (for simplicity, just showing height): C:\Apps\test>..\exiftool-9.85\exiftool.exe -H DSC_1082.JPG "-*Height*" 0xa003 Exif Image ...

The command was mogrify -resize 2048x2048; I was then using exiftool to look at the metadata. Exiftool reports both an Exif Image Height/Width value as well as an Image Height/Width value. For background, I have a very large collection of images that I had resized using the mogrify command; I was ...

I observed this using both "convert" and "mogrify".

Using either convert or mogrify to resize images, I see that in the resulting images, the values for the Exif Image Height(Width) and the Image Height(Width) values as reported by ExifTool differ: Exif Image Height(Width) has the value for the original image, whereas Image Height(Width) has the ...