Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

My code on testing this on 6.9.0-6 Almost all were copied from what ImageMagick suggested. I have no idea what causes the difference between our test code and theirs. #include "third_party/ImageMagick6/Magick++.h" using namespace std; using namespace Magick; int main(int argc,char **argv ...

typo above. I meant the difference between 6.9.0-6 and "6.9.1-0"
As we currently testing 6.9.0-6 which generates a very different result then what yo got on 6.9.1-0

Hello ImageMagick,
As we are very surprise on the big difference between 6.9.0-6 and 6.9.0-1 on morphology(), would you mind to run the same script on 6.9.0-6 and let us know what is the result on your side?
Thanks,
Wenjing

In that case looks like a gap between v_6.9.0-6 (our current version) and v_6.9.1-0 on morphology() then.
Hyrum, this is FYI.
Looks like with v_6.9.1-0 and above, we have chance to get rid of filter().

Just retried what you suggested above with v_6.9.0.6 See the last page of this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11FDoZEZDkU4RhN7JuBz7wB-mjWzx5TnmyGGYmK96QXw/edit?usp=sharing the filter(...) was the new API which calls FilterImage(...) The result from them are very different. Could you let us ...

I replaced ConvolveMorphology with CorrelateMorphology within our C++ code and got the results very close to each other which is still very far from FilterImage() result Attached the result image at the end: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11FDoZEZDkU4RhN7JuBz7wB-mjWzx5TnmyGGYmK96QXw/edit?usp ...

Please see the difference we detected from ConvolveImage() and FilterImage(): https://docs.google.com/document/d/11FDoZEZDkU4RhN7JuBz7wB-mjWzx5TnmyGGYmK96QXw/edit?usp=sharing And also please notice: if we use "convert" command line with "conlvolve" args, it actually calls FilterImage() underneath.

Hi we did try ConvolveMorphology with MorphologyImage(), the result is actually very close to (if not exactly same) as the current ConvolveImage() which is very different from FilterImage(). If needed I can sent you the result images. Please advice on this.