Search found 3 matches
- 2015-03-26T14:48:50-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: signed 16 bit tiff is not read correctly
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1986
Re: signed 16 bit tiff is not read correctly
Thanks a lot for your answer. The work-around works nicely.
- 2015-03-26T10:30:10-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: signed 16 bit tiff is not read correctly
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1986
Re: signed 16 bit tiff is not read correctly
Here is an example :
https://www.dropbox.com/s/nm3bcypdiw0y38w/test.tif?dl=0
By looking at the histogram, it seems it has the correct number of values, but they're not interpreted correctly (they all fall in the 0-3% or 98-100% range).
Thanks !
https://www.dropbox.com/s/nm3bcypdiw0y38w/test.tif?dl=0
By looking at the histogram, it seems it has the correct number of values, but they're not interpreted correctly (they all fall in the 0-3% or 98-100% range).
Thanks !
- 2015-03-26T08:44:17-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: signed 16 bit tiff is not read correctly
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1986
signed 16 bit tiff is not read correctly
I have 16 bit signed integer grayscale microscopy images (that are displayed correctly in ImageJ), that appear black and white in display -- or in any program downstream of imagemagick. Identify reports a 16bit image, but uncorrectly gives a min value of 0 and a max of 65535 (I can check the correct ...