Search found 4 matches
- 2016-05-22T21:54:14-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: ImageMagick vulnerability Issue
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3957
Re: ImageMagick vulnerability Issue
Great. Thank you for the information.
- 2016-05-22T21:30:40-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: ImageMagick vulnerability Issue
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3957
Re: ImageMagick vulnerability Issue
Thanks for the feedback.
Will the modification of policy.xml file for newer version resolve the issue? Is there any disadvantage or bad effect on your application when you apply the modification?
Will the modification of policy.xml file for newer version resolve the issue? Is there any disadvantage or bad effect on your application when you apply the modification?
- 2016-05-20T06:14:36-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: ImageMagick vulnerability Issue
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3957
Re: ImageMagick vulnerability Issue
Thank you for the response. I'm using IM 6.4.5
I tried the option to modify the delegate.xml file. It address the issue with HTTPS but not the 'Label' pseudo protocol.
I tried the option to modify the delegate.xml file. It address the issue with HTTPS but not the 'Label' pseudo protocol.
- 2016-05-20T02:51:48-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: ImageMagick vulnerability Issue
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3957
ImageMagick vulnerability Issue
Good day, I am currently working for the fix to address the vulnerability issue stated here. https://imagetragick.com/#policy I'm using SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 10. I can't find the policy.xml file that is suggested to be modified to solve the problem. I found some fix that can be applied to ...