Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

snibgo, This may be premature but I think you are right. In Capture One under the Process Recipe tool and under "Options" "Uncompressed, LZW, Zip, No Thumbnail, Tile Dimensions" are selectable. I had " Uncompressed" selected but after selecting "Uncompressed, No Thumbnail" it no longer identifies ...

snibgo,

That makes sense. I had the same idea. I looked and didn't see the "Create thumbnails on save" box checked but can have another go at it. I'll try a few things and show you the documentation later.

Snibgo, I've specified that they were processed in Capture One 11 from IIQ RAWs into TIFF 8 bit Uncompressed Adobe RGB (1998) 300ppi Scale Fixed 100%. And it wouldn't surprise me as Phase One/Capture One is buggy as stuff and they take steps to make everything propriety on arbitrary grounds. I tried ...

snibgo,

Yes what you said is true. It is strange, isn't it?

Thank you for all of your help.

snibgo, Yes, I see how that is correct. I'm a layperson so wasn't aware of that before. "Compare" doesn't do anything for me. The number of pixels is similar. fmw42 was right in that the image is lacking compression. It becomes uncompressed when working with IM and then needs to be compressed again ...

fmw42, This is what I typed (these are the source tif files) Identify 208029.tif[0] TIFF 8778x11803 8778x11803+0+0 8-bit sRGB 296.483MiB 0.010u 0:00.020 208029.tif[1] TIFF 119x160 119x160+0+0 8-bit sRGB 296.483MiB 0.000u 0:00.000 208036.tif[0] TIFF 7890x11835 7890x11835+0+0 8-bit sRGB 267.213MiB 0 ...

fmw42, They are processed into 8-bit tifs. I can understand how it is adding more colors. I tried your command of "-type palette" as well as "-type optimize" however neither worked. I still have the same problem with the read sizes being different. I agree with you and neither do I see a connection ...

fmw42, Thank you for the prompt feedback. It seems that this is the issue as when I processed the RAWs from Capture One, I selected to have Uncompressed TIFF. I processed the file again this time with LZW compression selected and the file read sizes were more accurate after using IM commands ...

fmw42, Thanks for the feedback once again. Here is what I did identify 208021.tif[0] TIFF 11835x8423 11835x8423+0+0 8-bit sRGB 285.264MiB 0.000u 0:00.000 208021.tif[1] TIFF 160x114 160x114+0+0 8-bit sRGB 285.264MiB 0.000u 0:00.000 208036.tif[0] TIFF 7890x11835 7890x11835+0+0 8-bit sRGB 267.213MiB 0 ...

snibgo,

Do you know how I can install this version? I'm having some difficulty finding it and I tried to reconfigure mine to Q8 but it didn't work.

Also, I did use the "-depth 8" command but I still had the same issue with the Photoshop and OS file read.

Thank you for your help

snibgo, Thank you for the input. I think it might be a quantam range issue as was pointed out before. My ImageMagick version is computing with Q16 so even though I am reading an 8-bit file ImageMagick and the OS are interepring it as if it is 16-bit. Is there a way to change/modify my ImageMagick ...

fmw42, Thank you for the amazing feedback. I really appreciate these explanations. I feel that it will get me closer to a solution. I will provide more concrete and detailed documentation of my methodology. I'll get a smaller sample size and get the independent and dependent variables together and ...

Hello, I am a new user running ImageMagick 6.9.9-26 Q16 on Mac El Capitan. I am really enjoying it thus far, however, I have an issue when using it. I have been using ImageMagick to batch resize images for my employer. I have had no problems running the commands and getting the results I am looking ...