I see, you have to actually kinda read it in reverse to understand more easily what the output is supposed to... output ^^
Well, good to know , thanks
Search found 8 matches
- 2019-06-09T08:36:16-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8914
- 2019-06-09T07:53:07-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8914
Re: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
Yeah, the fact that -geometry is before -composite is what confused me for a bit, it's not really an option to the command -composite, but an option to the arguments of the command -composite. And yeah, your way works for when the output is the same size as 1.png (or when 2.png is inside 1.png ...
- 2019-06-09T06:03:39-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8914
Re: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
deleted (can't find how to delete) Edit : Finally found a way to achieve it magick `( `( -size <xFinal>x<yFinal> xc:none `) 1.png -composite `) 2.png -geometry +<xOffset>+<yOffset> -composite out.png I create a transparent canvas of the size of rectangle surrounding the overlapping images, put the ...
- 2019-06-09T04:39:24-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8914
Re: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
Offset is always a single number ? Isn't there a simple (inbuilt?) way to overlay an image on top of another with just an x and y axis value then (with pixel as a measure) ? Edit : i'm guessing i should try and search for something with layers Edit 2 : Ok, seems like what i'm trying to use is ...
- 2019-06-09T03:01:29-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8914
Re: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
Well i have another question if i may (sorry for the double post, i don't really see where rules are listed).
Isn't an offset of the form +x+y ? The second part (+y) doesn't seem to have any influence on the result of smush, even if it does seem to be grammatically correct
Isn't an offset of the form +x+y ? The second part (+y) doesn't seem to have any influence on the result of smush, even if it does seem to be grammatically correct
- 2019-06-09T02:37:26-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8914
Re: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
IM works with lists of images. Most operations ("-crop" etc) operate on all the images in the current list. Open parenthesis "(" starts a new list; close parenthesis ")" ends the list and merges resulting images into the outer list. So this will crop both images: magick convert image1.png image2 ...
- 2019-06-08T15:34:24-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8914
Re: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
Thanks, it works when i read the image first indeed. Is reading the image after the process for when you want to apply the process to several images then ?
- 2019-06-08T15:05:27-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8914
New to Imagemagick, need something to be clarified
Hello, I am very new to Imagemagick, trying to understand how the command lines are working, and i am having some trouble. First, i don't understand what the keyword convert does. Second, i don't understand how the inputs are handled. How do you transform an image, and put it as an input of another ...