EWA LanczosSharpest

[NicolasRobidoux]

It is my current opinion that the EWA LanczosSharpest should be named methods, in particular because the 4 lobe version is quite good with some type of content (not so the 3 lobe version).
Some of the evidence:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum ... #msg720827
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p ... ost1668680
Section 6.2.1 of Adam Turcotte's Masters thesis: http://web.cs.laurentian.ca/nrobidoux/m ... Thesis.pdf

[fmw42]

It is my current opinion that the EWA LanczosSharpest should be named methods

Could you clarify your statement? What do you mean by "named methods"?

[NicolasRobidoux]

I meant that, for example, all you'd have to do is

Code: Select all

-define filter:lobes=4 -filter LanczosSharpest

to get what is currently obtained with

Code: Select all

-filter Lanczos -define filter:lobes=4 -define filter:blur=0.88451002338585141

.
Basically do with the LanczosSharpest (for which I'd need to spend time getting the blurs for every single one up to a large number of lobes) what was done with LanczosSharp.

[NicolasRobidoux]

I can do most (all?) the work except documentation I think. I just need the key "OK".

[magick]

Ok.

[NicolasRobidoux]

Thank you Cristy.

Probably will have to wait until I am on vacation. But it's on the TODO list.