Dear Reader,
Here I'm trying to find out some charactaristics of jpeg2000 en/decoder: Lurawave JP2 Plugin for Irfanview, Kakadu (current version), Openjpeg 2.1.0.
Here my test image (somewhat synthetic, with small @ with different contrasts):
Target size: 64600 bytes.
Here the difference of the results
Below red line: lurawave
below green line: kakadu
below blue line: openjpeg
Discussion:
Lurawave: Some darker @ symbols are visible, meaning that some @ with low contrast vanished. Color constancy is good.
Kakadu: A lot of high-frequency noise - unusable for text scans; very good color constancy.
Openjpeg2.1: No @ symbols lost - color constancy comparable to lurawave, but somewhat more coarse.
I'm wondering where the significant color differences are (see thread "better quantization tables")
Kind regards...
jpeg2000 coder charactaristics
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 2014-03-30T05:04:26-07:00
- Authentication code: 6789
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 2014-03-30T05:04:26-07:00
- Authentication code: 6789
Re: jpeg2000 coder charactaristics
Well, now somewhat more psychedelic:
Original (some dots with pixel text of varying contrast):
Target size: 23040 bytes (1/40).
Lurawave JP2 Irfanview:
Kakadu 7.4 with -precise:
Openjpeg2.1:
And here the optically enhanced difference
below red line = lurawave
below green line = kakadu
below blue line = openjpeg2.1
Openjpeg: large color shift at borders, but sharp text.
Kakadu: noisy Text.
Lurawave: something between.
Original (some dots with pixel text of varying contrast):
Target size: 23040 bytes (1/40).
Lurawave JP2 Irfanview:
Kakadu 7.4 with -precise:
Openjpeg2.1:
And here the optically enhanced difference
below red line = lurawave
below green line = kakadu
below blue line = openjpeg2.1
Openjpeg: large color shift at borders, but sharp text.
Kakadu: noisy Text.
Lurawave: something between.