Hi,
I confirm the image I uploaded was the original one (no IM command used before, it's a raw image).
So, by only doing:
the result is as seen before; there is some kind of compression -> quality loss.
Plus, there is some strange stripes at the right of the image. Here are the original and output image again, print screen from Photoshop:
Original:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caff7/caff736e014b61d669eb6f800d53c3ab11657135" alt="Image"
IM processed:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89013/89013369f5c3d9e6bd2e92037c361086198d6b33" alt="Image"
(at this zoomed out level, the quality loss is not discernible, but it is really there as show on previous page).
Here are the differences between the two files (left=original, right=output) with the
command:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3c7f/f3c7f42b8253c750ed442f8bfde253637c67a010" alt="Image"
No real infos here...
And here's the result from
(
http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ ):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7e12/f7e1250e8e718207a04b54293cd08f2b9b2bd95d" alt="Image"
(lot of EXIF data are lost after using ImageMagick.....)
I was also wondering... this may be a Photoshop issue, but in that case, why does the images processed with
gdal for example look
exactly like the original and not the ones processed with IM?
I also tried to visualize input and output images on a raw processing software for Photographs (Darktable) on my Linux platform, I can also see the loss of detail on the output image...
Thanks a lot for your help!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fff91/fff91b021592121aacbe5703ec1d59e2fad06369" alt="Smile :)"