[DISREGARD] possible bug sigmoidal-contrast IM 6.7.9.5 beta

Post any defects you find in the released or beta versions of the ImageMagick software here. Include the ImageMagick version, OS, and any command-line required to reproduce the problem. Got a patch for a bug? Post it here.
Post Reply
User avatar
fmw42
Posts: 25562
Joined: 2007-07-02T17:14:51-07:00
Authentication code: 1152
Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA

[DISREGARD] possible bug sigmoidal-contrast IM 6.7.9.5 beta

Post by fmw42 »

ImageMagick-6.7.9-5.tar.bz2 12-Sep-2012 12:16 Mac OSX Snow Leopart

This still produces a totally black image and not the input image (no-op) as I thought was going to be the case with Nicolas's new code. Correct me if I am wrong about this.

convert zelda3.jpg -sigmoidal-contrast 0 zelda3_sig_0.jpg
Last edited by fmw42 on 2012-09-12T12:10:14-07:00, edited 1 time in total.
NicolasRobidoux
Posts: 1944
Joined: 2010-08-28T11:16:00-07:00
Authentication code: 8675308
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: possible bug -sigmoidal-contrast IM 6.7.9.5 beta Q16

Post by NicolasRobidoux »

No problem with IM7. Let me check IM6.
User avatar
fmw42
Posts: 25562
Joined: 2007-07-02T17:14:51-07:00
Authentication code: 1152
Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA

Re: possible bug -sigmoidal-contrast IM 6.7.9.5 beta Q16

Post by fmw42 »

NicolasRobidoux wrote:No problem with IM7. Let me check IM6.

My bad. I was still testing on IM 6.7.9.4. I forgot to use my beta template. It is fine in the beta.

Sorry for the false alarm.
NicolasRobidoux
Posts: 1944
Joined: 2010-08-28T11:16:00-07:00
Authentication code: 8675308
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: [DISREGARD] possible bug sigmoidal-contrast IM 6.7.9.5 b

Post by NicolasRobidoux »

It's fine in my svn IM6.
Last edited by NicolasRobidoux on 2012-09-12T12:26:37-07:00, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
fmw42
Posts: 25562
Joined: 2007-07-02T17:14:51-07:00
Authentication code: 1152
Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA

Re: [DISREGARD] possible bug sigmoidal-contrast IM 6.7.9.5 b

Post by fmw42 »

NicolasRobidoux wrote:It's fine in my svn IM6. (For one minute, this message said that it was broken, but I was working too fast...)

Sorry. I did say it was broken, but then after your first post, I realized that I was testing under IM 6.7.9.4 and not IM 6.7.9.5 beta. I then went back and tested properly for the beta and all works fine in IM 6.

Sorry for the confusion. I amended the topic so as not to bother Magick.
Post Reply