possible bug label: IM 6.8.3.9 Q16

Post any defects you find in the released or beta versions of the ImageMagick software here. Include the ImageMagick version, OS, and any command-line required to reproduce the problem. Got a patch for a bug? Post it here.
Post Reply
User avatar
fmw42
Posts: 25562
Joined: 2007-07-02T17:14:51-07:00
Authentication code: 1152
Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA

possible bug label: IM 6.8.3.9 Q16

Post by fmw42 »

IM 6.8.3.9 Q16 Mac OSX Snow Leopard

Label: does not seem to change the font size to fill a specified width.

convert -size 200x -background white -fill black -font arial label:"some text" show:

The result does not span the full 200 pixel width.

Testing some versions of IM, it appears not to work after 6.7.9.0. At 6.7.9.0 it was working.

I see a changelog entry for

2012-08-16 6.7.9-1 Cristy <quetzlzacatenango@image...>
In rare cases, label would not auto-size properly (reference viewtopic.php?f=3&t=21716).

Then later

2012-11-25 6.8.0-7 Cristy <quetzlzacatenango@image...>
Width value is optional for label coder (e.g. -size x40 label:Magick).

Perhaps there are conflicting issues with all the changes?
Last edited by fmw42 on 2013-05-09T19:48:43-07:00, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
magick
Site Admin
Posts: 11064
Joined: 2003-05-31T11:32:55-07:00

Re: possible but label: IM 6.8.3.9 Q16

Post by magick »

We can reproduce the problem you posted and have a patch in ImageMagick 6.8.3-10 Beta available by sometime tomorrow. Thanks.
User avatar
anthony
Posts: 8883
Joined: 2004-05-31T19:27:03-07:00
Authentication code: 8675308
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: possible but label: IM 6.8.3.9 Q16

Post by anthony »

I posted my own findings on this in
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22964#p98250
Anthony Thyssen -- Webmaster for ImageMagick Example Pages
https://imagemagick.org/Usage/
User avatar
fmw42
Posts: 25562
Joined: 2007-07-02T17:14:51-07:00
Authentication code: 1152
Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA

Re: possible but label: IM 6.8.3.9 Q16

Post by fmw42 »

anthony wrote:I posted my own findings on this in
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22964#p98250
The width part got fixed. But I have noticed that it does not work with xHeight.
Post Reply