Page 2 of 2
Re: Proportional watermark
Posted: 2017-02-04T08:21:10-07:00
by n0_namer
I tried this variant. It takes a height of the watermark.png but I need to take a height of the input.png.
Re: Proportional watermark
Posted: 2017-02-04T11:00:58-07:00
by fmw42
In IM 7, this gets 1/5 of the input image height and resizes the watermark image to that size.
Code: Select all
magick input.png -set option:wmh "%[fx:h/5]" ( watermark.png -resize x%[wmh] ) -gravity center -composite result.png
Re: Proportional watermark
Posted: 2017-02-04T14:46:29-07:00
by n0_namer
Works perfect. Thanks, snibgo.
Re: Proportional watermark
Posted: 2017-02-04T14:57:49-07:00
by fmw42
I am not snibgo
Re: Proportional watermark
Posted: 2017-10-16T06:03:07-07:00
by fghhfg
A version:
Code: Select all
magick input.png ( watermark.png -resize x%[fx:u[0].h/5] ) -gravity center -composite result.png
this is wrong, but it is faster than b version.
B version:
Code: Select all
magick input.png -set option:wmh "%[fx:h/5]" ( watermark.png -resize x%[wmh] ) -gravity center -composite result.png
now I want to speedup, so I use "-sample" instead of "-resize".
The"-sample" of B version is still faster than the "-sample" of A version. (x1.55 times)
For this reason, you may want to use the wrong version if possible...
the "Image Stack" or "-set" cost a lot of speed...
How do I speedup on corrected version?
my code (IM7):
Code: Select all
find a -type f -name "*.jpg" -print0 | xargs -0 -n1 -P8 -I {} magick {} -set option:wmh %[fx:w/2] ( mark2.png -sample %[wmh]x ) -gravity east -compose dissolve -define compose:args=60 -composite {}
Re: Proportional watermark
Posted: 2017-10-16T07:21:11-07:00
by GeeMack
fghhfg wrote: ↑2017-10-16T06:03:07-07:00How do I speedup on corrected version?
I don't know much about the internals, but if there's something about setting and reading a variable that slows the command, you could try writing the FX calculation as an inline argument to the "-resize" operation. A command like this should give you the result you're looking for. You'll have to test it yourself for speed comparison.
Code: Select all
magick input.png watermark.png -resize "x%[fx:t?u[0].h/5:u[0].h]" -gravity center -composite result.png
The FX expression there will only resize the second image in the stack, which is the watermark. Otherwise it leaves the size unchanged.
Re: Proportional watermark
Posted: 2017-10-16T10:35:21-07:00
by fghhfg
ternary operator, nice try, but it has same speed as `"Image Stack" + "-set"`
OK, I accept this result.
Now I believe the reason b version spend few time just because it deals few pixels.
nothing wrong inside IM.
I find xnconvert faster than IM though.