Incompatibility from version 6.3.5
Posted: 2008-04-28T08:36:46-07:00
When I use the following command:
convert -modulate 100,0,100 -level 70% -depth 8 jpg:original.jpg pnm:new.pnm
I obtain very different results with ImageMagick before and after version 6.3.5.
For example, using the following image:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52a09/52a09d42bcae690dac6c55705848e1f0beaed837" alt="Image"
I obtain this result with IM 6.3.5 or earlier (further reconverted to png with Gimp):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abbe5/abbe5fd625f6247c3bedad149c7e964bae515ef7" alt="Image"
and this is the result with versions after 6.3.5, up to the latest version (further reconverted to png with Gimp):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16388/163885e1a48cb11efcbbd8063b1664a21f1b1820" alt="Image"
Note that the "after 6.3.5" result image is not just a negated version of "before 6.3.5".
Also note that the behavior is consistent in Linux and Mac OS X.
Why is the behaviour changed? Is this a bug?
Thanks in advance,
Silvio
convert -modulate 100,0,100 -level 70% -depth 8 jpg:original.jpg pnm:new.pnm
I obtain very different results with ImageMagick before and after version 6.3.5.
For example, using the following image:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52a09/52a09d42bcae690dac6c55705848e1f0beaed837" alt="Image"
I obtain this result with IM 6.3.5 or earlier (further reconverted to png with Gimp):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abbe5/abbe5fd625f6247c3bedad149c7e964bae515ef7" alt="Image"
and this is the result with versions after 6.3.5, up to the latest version (further reconverted to png with Gimp):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16388/163885e1a48cb11efcbbd8063b1664a21f1b1820" alt="Image"
Note that the "after 6.3.5" result image is not just a negated version of "before 6.3.5".
Also note that the behavior is consistent in Linux and Mac OS X.
Why is the behaviour changed? Is this a bug?
Thanks in advance,
Silvio