possible bug or inconsistency in specifying alpha in -fx

Post any defects you find in the released or beta versions of the ImageMagick software here. Include the ImageMagick version, OS, and any command-line required to reproduce the problem. Got a patch for a bug? Post it here.
Post Reply
User avatar
fmw42
Posts: 25562
Joined: 2007-07-02T17:14:51-07:00
Authentication code: 1152
Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA

possible bug or inconsistency in specifying alpha in -fx

Post by fmw42 »

Is this a bug or inconsistency in specifying alpha values in color definitions within -fx. I thought alpha in rgba always was specified in range 0-1. See my last post in blue in viewtopic.php?f=1&t=13083

IM 6.4.9-2 Q16 Mac OSX Tiger

Or have I misinterpreted/misused something?
Top
User avatar
anthony
Posts: 8883
Joined: 2004-05-31T19:27:03-07:00
Authentication code: 8675308
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: possible bug or inconsistency in specifying alpha in -fx

Post by anthony »

rgba() in a -fx formula should follow the same syntax as for color.

So yes I would say that is a bug.
Anthony Thyssen -- Webmaster for ImageMagick Example Pages
https://imagemagick.org/Usage/
Top
User avatar
magick
Site Admin
Posts: 11064
Joined: 2003-05-31T11:32:55-07:00

Re: possible bug or inconsistency in specifying alpha in -fx

Post by magick »

The problem you reported is fixed in ImageMagick 6.4.9-3. Thanks.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Bugs”