If the Imagick object only contains one image, which function to use setFormat or setImageFormat?
In general, which one to use in what circumstances? I am quite confused between the two.
Really appreciate any clarification.
what is the difference between setFormat and setImageFormat
Re: what is the difference between setFormat and setImageFormat
Hello,
usually "Image"-variants of the image affect the current image sequence where as the ones without image are global properties for the object.
usually "Image"-variants of the image affect the current image sequence where as the ones without image are global properties for the object.
Mikko Koppanen
My blog: http://valokuva.org
My blog: http://valokuva.org
-
- Posts: 1015
- Joined: 2005-03-21T21:16:57-07:00
Re: what is the difference between setFormat and setImageFormat
See the response by magick in this post:
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=14899
where a similar question was asked.
Pete
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=14899
where a similar question was asked.
Pete
Sorry, my ISP shutdown all personal webspace so my MagickWand Examples in C is offline.
See my message in this topic for a link to a zip of all the files.
See my message in this topic for a link to a zip of all the files.