Page 1 of 1
Is this expected behavior for -coalesce IM 6.7.9.0 Q16
Posted: 2012-08-21T17:09:37-07:00
by fmw42
IM 6.7.9.0 Q16 Snow Leopard
Is this expected behavior for -coalesce? Without -coalesce I get a meaningful result.
With coalesce the result it totally transparent.
convert -size 128x128 xc: logo3.jpg lena2.jpg zelda3.jpg miff:- |\
convert - -delete 0 -evaluate-sequence mean show:
convert -size 128x128 xc: logo3.jpg lena2.jpg zelda3.jpg miff:- |\
convert -
-coalesce -delete 0 -evaluate-sequence mean show:
Re: Is this expected behavior for -coalesce IM 6.7.9.0 Q16
Posted: 2012-08-21T17:25:18-07:00
by magick
We'll take a look @ the problem. In the mean-time add -alpha off to your command line.
Re: Is this expected behavior for -coalesce IM 6.7.9.0 Q16
Posted: 2012-08-21T18:02:19-07:00
by fmw42
magick wrote:We'll take a look @ the problem. In the mean-time add -alpha off to your command line.
Thanks. I just removed the -coalesce in my script and it works fine. But I wanted to be sure that this is what you expect when using -coalesce.
Re: Is this expected behavior for -coalesce IM 6.7.9.0 Q16
Posted: 2012-09-02T22:44:47-07:00
by anthony
As you have not set disposals, and all later frames are opaque -coalesce should do nothing. I'd say something is haywire in the low level comparison functions due to alpha changes.
I have no time to look at it though.
Re: Is this expected behavior for -coalesce IM 6.7.9.0 Q16
Posted: 2012-09-03T10:24:44-07:00
by fmw42
anthony wrote:As you have not set disposals, and all later frames are opaque -coalesce should do nothing. I'd say something is haywire in the low level comparison functions due to alpha changes.
I have no time to look at it though.
I believe Magick made a change already.
2012-08-16 6.7.9-1 Cristy <quetzlzacatenango@image...>
...
Don't add matte channel for -coalesce if input images don't have one.