IM 6.8.3.9 Q16 Mac OSX Snow Leopard
Label: does not seem to change the font size to fill a specified width.
convert -size 200x -background white -fill black -font arial label:"some text" show:
The result does not span the full 200 pixel width.
Testing some versions of IM, it appears not to work after 6.7.9.0. At 6.7.9.0 it was working.
I see a changelog entry for
2012-08-16 6.7.9-1 Cristy <quetzlzacatenango@image...>
In rare cases, label would not auto-size properly (reference viewtopic.php?f=3&t=21716).
Then later
2012-11-25 6.8.0-7 Cristy <quetzlzacatenango@image...>
Width value is optional for label coder (e.g. -size x40 label:Magick).
Perhaps there are conflicting issues with all the changes?
possible bug label: IM 6.8.3.9 Q16
- fmw42
- Posts: 25562
- Joined: 2007-07-02T17:14:51-07:00
- Authentication code: 1152
- Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA
possible bug label: IM 6.8.3.9 Q16
Last edited by fmw42 on 2013-05-09T19:48:43-07:00, edited 1 time in total.
Re: possible but label: IM 6.8.3.9 Q16
We can reproduce the problem you posted and have a patch in ImageMagick 6.8.3-10 Beta available by sometime tomorrow. Thanks.
- anthony
- Posts: 8883
- Joined: 2004-05-31T19:27:03-07:00
- Authentication code: 8675308
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
Re: possible but label: IM 6.8.3.9 Q16
I posted my own findings on this in
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22964#p98250
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22964#p98250
Anthony Thyssen -- Webmaster for ImageMagick Example Pages
https://imagemagick.org/Usage/
https://imagemagick.org/Usage/
- fmw42
- Posts: 25562
- Joined: 2007-07-02T17:14:51-07:00
- Authentication code: 1152
- Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA
Re: possible but label: IM 6.8.3.9 Q16
The width part got fixed. But I have noticed that it does not work with xHeight.anthony wrote:I posted my own findings on this in
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22964#p98250