XMP metadata - unable to see clipping path in tiff
Posted: 2013-09-30T14:25:46-07:00
i have been banging my head against the wall with the problem for about a week. i suspect the problem lies in (what appears to me to be) adobe's habit of radically and frequently changing the content of its XMP metadata. that said, i am still hoping someone has a fix either via imagemagick improvement (bug fix?) or other suggestions (e.g. other tools to use on linux -- i am trying tiffinfo, exiftool, exiv2, etc.... not much luck yet!)
i am trying to use a clipping path in a tiff file. the clipping path exists within photoshop. when my client saves the files, we cannot see the clipping paths via imagemagick. i can open it in photoshop, do nothing other than save it as a tiff, and then can see the clipping path with imagemagick.
by looking at the tiff file with a text editor, i can see two different XMP tool kits are being used: x:xmptk="Adobe XMP Core 5.3-c011 66.145661, 2012/02/06-14:56:27" (mine) and x:xmptk="XMP Core 5.1.2" (theirs). this is despite the fact they are using a slightly newer version of photoshop than me (13.0.3 vs 13.0.1).
any precedence for this? help? clues?
thank you.
-jon
p.s. if you are serious about taking a look at the file in order to fix this, please let me know so i can arrange to send it to you directly. i do not wish to post the clients image data to a public forum; and i cannot create a broken example file with my version of photoshop. thanks.
i am trying to use a clipping path in a tiff file. the clipping path exists within photoshop. when my client saves the files, we cannot see the clipping paths via imagemagick. i can open it in photoshop, do nothing other than save it as a tiff, and then can see the clipping path with imagemagick.
by looking at the tiff file with a text editor, i can see two different XMP tool kits are being used: x:xmptk="Adobe XMP Core 5.3-c011 66.145661, 2012/02/06-14:56:27" (mine) and x:xmptk="XMP Core 5.1.2" (theirs). this is despite the fact they are using a slightly newer version of photoshop than me (13.0.3 vs 13.0.1).
any precedence for this? help? clues?
thank you.
-jon
p.s. if you are serious about taking a look at the file in order to fix this, please let me know so i can arrange to send it to you directly. i do not wish to post the clients image data to a public forum; and i cannot create a broken example file with my version of photoshop. thanks.