Page 1 of 1
ImageMagick: static vs dynamic
Posted: 2013-10-03T05:01:25-07:00
by hknight
What factors should be taken into consideration when choosing between a static and dynamic build of ImageMagick? Are there differences in performance of processing? Are there differences in the images produced?
Re: ImageMagick: static vs dynamic
Posted: 2013-10-03T20:19:03-07:00
by snibgo
There should be no differences in the images produced.
If you run multiple IM processes at the same time, the DLL versions may use memory more efficiently because (as I understand it) different programs can share the same DLL in memory, but each needs its own EXE in memory. In these days of computers with multiple GB of memory, I doubt this is significant.
There may also be performance differences for the loading of the 6MB static versions. The first time I use "convert" after a boot, there is a noticeable delay. But subsequent uses have no delay, due to caching, I suppose.
For servers, differences may be more significant, and you might need to conduct tests. For workstations, I don't think it matters.
Personally, I use the static builds.