Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

I'd like to compress an image heavily, but use a higher quality setting for specific areas of an image, is this possible with ImageMagick?

You can compress the image multiple times with different settings. Then use masks to composite all the images together.

Or compress the image the least amount and then use -region or -mask to compress further in the desired areas.

see
http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/compose/#compose
http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/layers/#convert
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/comma ... php#region
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/comma ... s.php#mask
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/comma ... #clip-mask

If you can clarify further the regions you want to use, then perhaps a better answer with example could be provided.

fmw42 wrote:You can compress the image multiple times with different settings. Then use masks to composite all the images together.

Or compress the image the least amount and then use -region or -mask to compress further in the desired areas.

see
http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/compose/#compose
http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/layers/#convert
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/comma ... php#region
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/comma ... s.php#mask
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/comma ... #clip-mask

If you can clarify further the regions you want to use, then perhaps a better answer with example could be provided.

Thanks! The region I want to be compressed less is the lower right corner: http://needsmorejpeg.com/i/mry

I was just checking out this site needsmorejpeg.com and the problem is that the watermark is also compressed heavily (since that's the purpose of the site; "more jpeg"), but it kind of makes the watermark useless, since you can't read it.

Can you provide a link to your orginal input image and the exact region you want to compress less.

fmw42 wrote:Can you provide a link to your orginal input image and the exact region you want to compress less.

Sure. This is the image I want to compress a lot, except for the region described below: http://i.imgur.com/Zb6r15W.png

And the area I want to compress less is defined by the following rectangle in the above picture (x1,y1,x2,y2): 386,359,493,372

Thanks!

try this (unix syntax)


convert yourimage \
\( -clone 0 -fill white -colorize 100 -fill black -draw "rectangle 386,359 493,372" -write mpr:image +delete \) \
-mask mpr:image -quality 10 result.jpg

The second line creates a white image with your area marked in black as a mask and saves it to mpr: (in memory format) and deletes the mask from the image chain leaving the copy in memory.

The third line applies the in-memory mask using -mask.

You can change the -quality setting to whatever you want. I use 10 to emphasize the compression for easy visualizing.

In window, remove the the \ from the \( and \) and replace the end of line \ with end of line ^


see http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/masking/#write_mask


NOTE: there appears to be some "bleeding" of the higher compression into your region. I believe this is because JPG compression works in blocks of (16?). So you would likely get better results by enlarging your region to multiples of the block size and aligning it on block boundaries. However, if you just make the region large enough to cover full blocks plus an extra block on all sizes as a buffer around the text, it should work without all that effort.


ALTERNATE:

convert yourimage \( -clone 0 -quality 10 \) \
\( -clone 0 -fill white -colorize 100 -fill black -draw "rectangle 386,359 493,372" \) \
-compose over -composite result.jpg


This clones the image and processes it with -quality 10. Then it creates the same mask (but does not write to mpr:). Then it uses the mask to composite the two images together.

I thought that "-quality" applied only to the saving on an image to a file, and could only apply to the entire image. I didn't think the OP's requirement could be met with IM.

Taking fmw42's alternative command on runeks's image, inserting a "write", Windows syntax: If we could have different compressions across the image, r.jpg and result.jpg would be different. But they are identical, and this remains true for a variety of compression numbers.

The results I get agree with snibgo.

Using this bash script should take the aforementioned example image and compress the right half of the image less than the left half. This doesn't happen, the whole image is compressed with quality=1, seemingly:
On further though; is this even possible?

As far as I can see, I need to specify two different quantization matrices in the JPEG file, and use a low quality one for the blocks I want compressed the most, and a high quality one for the blocks I want compressed not as much. Is this even allowed for the JPEG format?

snibgo is correct. So it looks like the only way to do that is with 3 steps, creating a tmp disk low quality jpg, compositing and deleting the tmp jpg afterwards


convert Zb6r15W.png -quality 10 1tmp.jpg

convert Zb6r15W.png 1tmp.jpg \
\( -clone 0 -fill white -colorize 100 -fill black -draw "rectangle 386,359 493,372" \) \
-compose over -composite result3.jpg

rm 1tmp.jpg


Or in two commands as

convert -respect-parenthesis Zb6r15W.png \( -clone 0 -quality 10 +write 1tmp.jpg \) +delete 1tmp.jpg \
\( -clone 0 -fill white -colorize 100 -fill black -draw "rectangle 386,359 493,372" \) \
-compose over -composite result4.jpg

rm 1tmp.jpg


The -respect-parenthesis is to avoid the -quality 10 being used on the original.

Or in a single command, eg:

I was just trying that, even though as I recall Anthony does not like that use of ephemeral, it does work.

You do not need -write rm.png unless you want to save the mask image for review.

My unix command equivalent to before would be


convert -respect-parenthesis yourimage \( -clone 0 -quality 10 +write 1tmp.jpg \) +delete ephemeral:1tmp.jpg \
\( -clone 0 -fill white -colorize 100 -fill black -draw "rectangle 386,359 493,372" \) \
-compose over -composite result4.jpg

You can remove the -respect-parenthesis if you reset a new -quality XX before the output (as in snibgo's command)

Hooray! That totally works. Thanks guys!

[I included "-write rm.png" so help me see what the desired effect should be. I didn't mean to include that in the suggested solution. Sorry about that.]

The jpegtran utility supports "crop 'n' drop". I'm curious if you could achieve smaller files or faster processing.

jpegclub.org/jpegtran/ wrote: Here is a sample output image and an equivalent shell script producing the same image using one temporary file.