Versioning policy (Windows installer in-place updates)
Posted: 2016-10-07T03:39:54-07:00
Looking at http://www.imagemagick.org/script/changelog.php the version numbers of im seem completely random - esp. when a change of 7.x.y to 7.x.y+1 occurs or when it's just a 7.x.y-z to 7.x.y-z+1 step.
The annoyance is that with a minor version number change, the Windows installers refuse to do an in-place update but you have to uninstall the old version manually. I guess this would make sense to have incompatible versions running along side each other - but for odd minor version bumps this doesn't make sense at all to me.
I know you devs would be simply running the git version, but from a user's point of view it would be nice if bugfixes would be marked with -z steps and only updates that could break something (and therefore deserve to install the new version side by side) get a .y step. Then reserve the .x updates for big publicity updates with press releases. Just my 2ct after manually uninstalling old .y versions so many times :-\
The annoyance is that with a minor version number change, the Windows installers refuse to do an in-place update but you have to uninstall the old version manually. I guess this would make sense to have incompatible versions running along side each other - but for odd minor version bumps this doesn't make sense at all to me.
I know you devs would be simply running the git version, but from a user's point of view it would be nice if bugfixes would be marked with -z steps and only updates that could break something (and therefore deserve to install the new version side by side) get a .y step. Then reserve the .x updates for big publicity updates with press releases. Just my 2ct after manually uninstalling old .y versions so many times :-\