Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

In IM 6.9.9.33 sparse-color: misses a pixel at coords: 4,1. But it is fine in IM 7.0.7.21

Input (6x2 pixels black and white):
http://www.fmwconcepts.com/misc_tests/s ... /image.png

Enlarged for viewing:


IM 7 is fine:
0,0,gray(0) 1,0,gray(255) 2,0,gray(255) 3,0,gray(0) 4,0,gray(255) 5,0,gray(255) 0,1,gray(255) 1,1,gray(0) 2,1,gray(0) 3,1,gray(255) 4,1,gray(255) 5,1,gray(0)

or perhaps easier to see:
0,0,gray(0)
1,0,gray(255)
2,0,gray(255)
3,0,gray(0)
4,0,gray(255)
5,0,gray(255)
0,1,gray(255)
1,1,gray(0)
2,1,gray(0)
3,1,gray(255)
4,1,gray(255)
5,1,gray(0)



But in IM 6, that pixel is missing:
0,0,gray(0) 1,0,gray(255) 2,0,gray(255) 3,0,gray(0) 4,0,gray(255) 5,0,gray(255) 0,1,gray(255) 1,1,gray(0) 2,1,gray(0) 3,1,gray(255) 5,1,gray(0)

or
0,0,gray(0)
1,0,gray(255)
2,0,gray(255)
3,0,gray(0)
4,0,gray(255)
5,0,gray(255)
0,1,gray(255)
1,1,gray(0)
2,1,gray(0)
3,1,gray(255)
5,1,gray(0)

P.S. It might be better to have sparse-color print a list rather than a string.

We get identical results for 6.9.9-34 and 7.0.7-22 under Fedora 27. The output of sparse: is designed for machine consumption so newlines are not recommended.

Perhaps a Mac issue only? Can you check on your Mac?

P.S. I just tested with the latest betas (6.9.9.34) and (7.0.7.22) and I still get coordinates 4,1,gray(0) missing for IM 6 but not for IM 7.

Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in GIT master branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ https://www.imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow.