Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

I want to determine the best/fastest way to detect if an image is entirely blank (assume image has alpha channel).

Test image https://www.dropbox.com/s/46zdazxrgy83g ... y.png?dl=0

Possible approaches:

1. Check for mean of zero (or standard deviation of zero?)
identify -format "%[opaque] %[fx:mean] %[fx:standard_deviation]" empty.png
False 0 0

Note: Photoshop reports mean of 255, so perhaps standard deviation is best value to go by?
Also, for my sample image, Imagemagick reports it as a Greyscale with Alpha, Photoshop treats it as RGB with Alpha - not sure why)

2. Check bounding box
identify -format "[%k]" emtpy.png
identify: geometry does not contain image `empty.png' @ warning/attribute.c/GetImageBoundingBox/240.
[0x0+855+540]

I like this approach since Imagemagick gives a nice warning message - any caveats to this technique?

Version: ImageMagick 7.0.7-14 Q16 x64 2017-12-06
Visual C++: 180040629
Features: Cipher DPC Modules OpenMP
Delegates (built-in): bzlib cairo flif freetype gslib jng jp2 jpeg lcms lqr openexr pangocairo png ps raw rsvg tiff webp xml zlib

identify -format "[%k]" emtpy.png

This is not a valid command. Properly it should be
But that tells you how many unique colors. If I do
1

It returns one unique color.

I would simply recommend
If it is full transparency, you get 0 and fully opaque you get 1 and partially transparent is some value in-between.

Apologies for the invalid command. I meant to use this for determining the bounding box:
Thanks for the recommended approach!

banisco wrote: ↑2018-03-05T15:31:15-07:00 Apologies for the invalid command. I meant to use this for determining the bounding box:

Code: Select all

identify -format "[%@]" empty.png

Thanks for the recommended approach!

That is not valid either. Leave off the brackets. Use brackets only when using fx:

Properly:
The virtual canvas would only be useful if you have a null transparent image with size 0x0. I do not see how that would help if you have an image that is transparent, but larger than 0x0. Are you looking for bad images?

Please clarify what you mean by "blank image". Is that just fully transparent?

fmw42 wrote: ↑2018-03-05T14:19:08-07:00 I would simply recommend

Code: Select all

convert image -channel a -separate -scale 1x1! -format "[fx:mean]\n" info:

If it is full transparency, you get 0 and fully opaque you get 1 and partially transparent is some value in-between.

Perfect ready-made answer to a problem I just tripped over today ... with the tiny exception that the command should be:

Yes, correct. That was a typo on my part. All string formats need to start with %