Page 1 of 1
Apply "-compose stereo" over a PNG transparent file
Posted: 2018-03-29T18:05:47-07:00
by Alexvb6
Hi,
I'm having trouble in
creating a stereo image with a transparent PNG source file.
My code below returns a stereo image, but on a black background, where I need it on a transparent background.
PS: I prefer to use the 'convert' tool, and not the 'composite' tool.
Using 'convert' is preferable as @fmw42 noted it in another post, because it avoids the need to split the process across multiple tools. (for reference :
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=33152&p=151959&hilit=stereo#p151959)
Additional thought : Would this be related to the bug Found by Fred in this post ?
http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-se ... 93#p152093
Using IM v7.0.7-28 Q16 x64 HDRI
Code: Select all
convert ^
c:\SOURCE.png ^
-set colorspace sRGB ^
-background transparent ^
-gravity Center -extent 1000x1000 ^
-write mpr:ExtendedSrcImage +delete ^
^
-alpha Set ^
-channel RGBCMYKA ^
-background "rgba(255,255,255,0)" ^
mpr:ExtendedSrcImage mpr:ExtendedSrcImage ^
-geometry +15+15 -compose stereo ^
-composite ^
-write mpr:StereoImage +delete ^
^
mpr:StereoImage ^
-trim ^
c:\DESTINATION.png
Re: Apply "-compose stereo" over a PNG transparent file
Posted: 2018-03-29T18:40:54-07:00
by Alexvb6
I also have tried to create my own manual Stereoscopy function, based on Fred's (as always) useful suggestion, but without success so far (the Background desperately remains Black, not Transparent) :
(Ref : http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-se ... hp?t=32209)
Code: Select all
convert ^
c:\SOURCE.png ^
-set colorspace sRGB ^
-alpha Set ^
( -clone 0 -background "rgba(0,0,0,0)" -channel r -separate -roll +15+15 +channel ) ^
( -clone 0 -background "rgba(0,0,0,0)" -channel gb -separate +channel ) ^
-delete 0 ^
-alpha Set ^
-channel RGBCMYK ^
-background "rgba(0,0,0,0)" ^
-combine c:\DESTINATION.png
Re: Apply "-compose stereo" over a PNG transparent file
Posted: 2018-03-29T19:00:54-07:00
by snibgo
Where do you want transparency to come from? Perhaps from SOURCE.png, but the output will contain only the red, green and blue channels, because those are the channels you selected then combined, not alpha. So we could have:
Code: Select all
convert ^
toes_holed.png ^
-set colorspace sRGB ^
-alpha Set ^
( -clone 0 -background "rgba(0,0,0,0)" ^
-channel r -separate -roll +15+15 +channel ^
) ^
( -clone 0 -background "rgba(0,0,0,0)" ^
-channel gba -separate +channel ^
) ^
-delete 0 ^
-alpha Set ^
-channel RGBA ^
-background "rgba(0,0,0,0)" ^
-combine ^
s.png
Re: Apply "-compose stereo" over a PNG transparent file
Posted: 2018-03-29T19:35:17-07:00
by Alexvb6
Hi Snibgo,
Your approach is really interesting, altough it does not handle the alpha channel the way "compose" did it.
Maybe trying to create a "manual stereo effect" is not the way to go... my guess is that using "
-geometry +15+15 -compose stereo" (as in Point 4 listed below) would be the best bet.
A graphical explanation will be better. I am sorry for not having created it in my original post; I apologize for that !
There will be :
- The source image
- The expected result, created with the "composite" tool
- What your suggestion produces with "convert", where the image is darker (especially on the blue layer)
- What I have achieved so far using "convert" : as satisfying than what "compose" produces, except the black background
1. THE SOURCE IMAGE
2. THE EXPECTED RESULT WITH "COMPOSITE"
Code: Select all
composite ^
-channel RGBCMYK -stereo +15+15 ^
c:\stereo-source.png ^
c:\stereo-source.png ^
c:\stereo-2.png
3. WHAT SNIBGO CODE PRODUCES
4. WHAT I HAVE ACHIEVED USING "CONVERT" : as satisfying than what "COMPOSE" produces, except the black background :
Code: Select all
convert ^
c:\stereo-source.png ^
-set colorspace sRGB ^
-background transparent ^
-write mpr:ExtendedSrcImage +delete ^
^
-alpha Set ^
-channel RGBCMYKA ^
-background "rgba(255,255,255,0)" ^
mpr:ExtendedSrcImage mpr:ExtendedSrcImage ^
-geometry +15+15 -compose stereo ^
-composite ^
-write mpr:StereoImage +delete ^
^
mpr:StereoImage ^
c:\stereo-4.png
The main goal is to achieve the "Point 2" using code in "Point 4", and rely on the "convert" tool instead of the "composite tool.
I feel close to it, but... actually not !