Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

Hi,

this is my first post here, after looking around the web I couldn't find the answer to this issue, which most probably have a very basic solution.

I want to merge 2 images by using a mask so I will have :

1.- original image a.jpg ( background )
2.- new image b.jpg ( over the background)
3.- mask image mask.jpg


explained graphically would be something like :



Any code sample on how to get to point 4 ?

would that work equally with a mask that has a gradient ?




thanks in advance

jordi wrote: ↑2018-04-19T04:31:01-07:00I want to merge 2 images by using a mask so I will have :

1.- original image a.jpg ( background )
2.- new image b.jpg ( over the background)
3.- mask image mask.jpg

[...]

Any code sample on how to get to point 4 ?

would that work equally with a mask that has a gradient ?

When you have a question here you need to give us more information. At the very least you should always let us know which version of IM you're using and what platform or OS you're working on. The answers can be a bit different – or a lot – depending on your set-up. Read the instructions at THIS link to learn how to form a proper question.

That said, the simplest composition with a mask should work with a command like this...
The white areas of your mask will determine which parts of the overlay image will be composited onto the background image. To see how it works with a gradient mask, try this experiment...
That isolates the mask image within the parentheses and applies a blur, then composites the overlay with a a softened edge determined by the blur of the mask.

The command above is in *nix shell command syntax. To use the same command in Windows CMD you need to remove the backslashes that escape the parentheses. Change this "\(...\)" to this "(...)". If you're using ImageMagick v7, use "magick" instead of "convert".

The page at THIS link describes the usage of the "-composite" operator in detail.

Thanks so much for the answer !

it works perfect !

sorry for not pointing my version, which is ImageMagick 7.0.7-14 Q16 x86_64 2017-12-07 working on mac.

I wanted to try the blur using a mask but, seems to works in a inverse way than what suggested above.
So I found a way to invert the colors of the mask
But I think there must be a way to avoid having to invert the mask, isn't it ?

Thanks again !

Kind regards

jordi wrote: ↑2018-04-19T08:29:50-07:00But I think there must be a way to avoid having to invert the mask, isn't it?

The mask is doing something a bit different with "-mask" and "-composite". If your mask needs to be inverted to work in a particular command, you can read in the mask inside some parentheses and negate it, blur it, or whatever before continuing like this...
Then continue the command as you need.

Hi, thanks and sorry because I did try code above merged with the one I was using to blur, and could not make it work

jordi wrote: ↑2018-04-20T02:07:45-07:00 Hi, thanks and sorry because I did try code above merged with the one I was using to blur, and could not make it work

Code: Select all

convert original.jpg : \( mask.jpg -alpha off -negate \)
  -blur 0x8   +mask  original_blured.jpg

That looks like a badly formed command. If you're using "-mask" you need to specify a file or a memory register "mpr:". The command would be assembled something like these...
You can find out more about the "mpr:" memory register at THIS link.

GREAT !! thanks again !

Just last question about masking, this time using polygons
I've seen this method which seems very interesting in some cases, I have been looking for a method to declare more than one polygon at a time, but could find any tip on the issue.

Is there some method top declare multiple polygon to operate some blur or fill ?

thanks again , and kind regards

Just draw multiple polygons to the same mask image. You can string different polygons in the same -draw or use multiple draws.

jordi wrote:... a method to declare more than one polygon at a time

As Fred says, just draw as many polygons as you want, for example:

thanks great !