Error when opening a JPEG composed with IM
Posted: 2007-03-26T01:26:30-07:00
Hi,
I'm very new here, so please be patient with me
I've composed several (thousands) small jpeg files into one big jpeg file of 32768x32768 pixels. I've done this through a batch script that iteratively calls the 'montage -mode concatenate -tile etc...' command.
But it seems the resulting file has some problem as I can't open it with any of IMDisplay, nor Photoshop.
IMDisplay prompts me the following error:
IMDisplayDoc function [DoReadImage] reported an error
imdisplay.exe: Application transferred too few scanlines
Photoshop CS2 tells me:
Could not complete your request because of a problem parsing JPEG data
with Paint Shop Pro X I can get at least the following file info:
Image Format: JPEG
Version: 1
Compression: Huffman - Standard
The strange thing is that I can successfully do any preview of the image, both with ACDSee or even Win Explorer.
Is there anyone having a clue on where's the issue and if I can fix it somehow ?
Thank you
Lorenz
P.S. of course, the original jpeg files don't have the same problem
I'm very new here, so please be patient with me
I've composed several (thousands) small jpeg files into one big jpeg file of 32768x32768 pixels. I've done this through a batch script that iteratively calls the 'montage -mode concatenate -tile etc...' command.
But it seems the resulting file has some problem as I can't open it with any of IMDisplay, nor Photoshop.
IMDisplay prompts me the following error:
IMDisplayDoc function [DoReadImage] reported an error
imdisplay.exe: Application transferred too few scanlines
Photoshop CS2 tells me:
Could not complete your request because of a problem parsing JPEG data
with Paint Shop Pro X I can get at least the following file info:
Image Format: JPEG
Version: 1
Compression: Huffman - Standard
The strange thing is that I can successfully do any preview of the image, both with ACDSee or even Win Explorer.
Is there anyone having a clue on where's the issue and if I can fix it somehow ?
Thank you
Lorenz
P.S. of course, the original jpeg files don't have the same problem